Since the completion of this book, many have misunderstood it, often mistaking falsehood for truth and antiquity for the present. I reiterate, the contents are of idle tales and fabricated stories. It merely uses contemporary names to embellish the narrative. How can tales of chivalry be penned by those who are unworthy? Foolishness or madness? It's to amuse people. Any resemblance is coincidental.
Jing, written at Madsage Hall